idea ·Taxi Driver (1976)

Schrader and Scorsese disagree about the ending

Ritual suicide or tabloid item? The writer and the director give incompatible accounts of the same scene, and the film supports both.

  • themes
  • structure
  • atomic
  • authorship
  • dispute

Scorsese, on what he wanted from the massacre:

Paul saw it as a kind of Samurai 'death with honour' — that's why De Niro attempts suicide — and he felt that if he'd directed the scene, there would have been tons of blood all over the walls, a more surrealistic effect. What I wanted was a Daily News situation, the sort you read about every day.

Scorsese on Scorsese (1989), sos 63sos 66

The disagreement runs deeper than the staging. Schrader denies the film is about Vietnam at all:

I didn't really make him a Vietnam vet. . . . It's assumed he has some kind of searing memory and that he's had some familiarity with weapons, but it's not meant to be a story about Vietnam and Vietnam is never discussed.

— Schrader (1990), quoted in Aaron Baker — A Companion to Martin Scorsese, smc 394

Scorsese's account is the opposite: the war is exactly what makes the reflected gutter look threatening, and he ties it to an uncle who ran two blocks when a car backfired (sos 62). For Schrader, Travis is Sartre's Antoine — existential, not traumatised (The returning veteran, 1976).

Do not resolve this. It is the most useful thing about the film for teaching Themes: two of its three authors describe a different film, the third (De Niro) rewrote the dialogue (De Niro wrote in the margins), and the finished object sustains every reading. Intention is evidence, not verdict.