Independence, 1973
Mean Streets was self-produced by two first-timers, shot non-union with a Corman crew, and sold to Warner Bros., who released it for two weeks. A case study in what independence bought and what it cost.
- format
- formula
- context
- commerce
- new-hollywood
- independent
- production
The datum
Stefan Sereda's chapter in the Companion calls it "Mean Streets as Cinema of Independence", and the facts support the title:
Mean Streets is therefore self-produced by two first-time producers, and the only film released under the banner, "A Taplin–Perry–Scorsese Production."
— The Companion, smc 372
The producer was Jonathan Taplin, twenty-six, until then road manager for Bob Dylan and The Band
(sos 39). His first backer, "a twenty-three-year-old who had just come into an inheritance",
pulled out (sos 39). What got the money in the end was a letter: Taplin could raise it "if Roger
Corman promised in writing to distribute the film" ([[Mary Pat Kelly — Martin Scorsese: A
Journey|Kelly]], unpaged).
How it was made cheap
Corman's crew from Boxcar Bertha; no Teamsters, "to avoid union costs" (smc 372); twenty-six
or twenty-seven days; mostly Los Angeles (New York was Los Angeles). Paul Rapp, Corman's man,
ran the schedule by lighting direction rather than by scene: "shoot everything that was lit in one
direction first, so Mean Streets was all shot backwards, as the master shot would be left until
last" (sos 41). Sometimes twenty-four set-ups a day, thirty-six for the pool-hall fight. The
handheld camera was an economy too: "if we'd tracked every one of the shots, we'd still have been
there shooting! So the economics dictated the style" (sos 47).
The budget figure depends on who you ask, from $300,000 to $750,000; see the hub, Mean Streets (1973).
What it cost
The film was finished independently and then sold to Warner Bros. What happened next is Scorsese's:
But next thing I know, we opened in LA, got nice reviews, did two weeks' business, and that was that. Every other city, the same thing. Warner was our distributor, and The Exorcist was coming in.
— Kelly, unpaged
Independence bought total control of the film and no control over its release. Sereda notes that
this arrangement, made outside a studio and distributed by one, now attracts the sneer
"dependies" (smc 368). Susan Hayward credits Scorsese with "bringing East Coast film production
to the fore (e.g. Taplin-Perry-Scorsese Productions for Mean Streets, 1973)" (ckc 231).
What it bought
A career. The film did little business and made its director. Coppola saw it and recommended him to
Ellen Burstyn for Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore, a studio film with "a budget three times that
of Mean Streets" (sos 49). See Alice Doesn't Live Here Anymore (1974) and
The women's picture, 1974.
Why it belongs on the bench
It is a clean Commerce case with every term visible: who paid, what they got, what the distributor decided, and how cost shaped style. Put it next to Corman offered to make it Black for the alternative financing that was refused, and next to The red tint over the bloodbath for what a studio could impose three years later, once Scorsese was inside one.
Films noted here that this context touches: Mean Streets (1973).